Clytaemnestra And Medea Two Women Seeking Justice free essay sample

Essay, Research Paper Clytaemnestra and Medea: Two adult females seeking justness Clytaemnestra and Medea are two adult females who are seeking justness for a incorrect committed by their hubbies. Clytaemnestra? s hubby, Agamemnon, did non wrong here straight but instead indirectly. Agamemnon sacrificed their girl Iphigeneia, in order to quiet the Thracian air currents. For Clytaemnestra this brought much hatred towards Agamemnon. Here Agamemnon had betrayed Clytaemnestra and their girls trust, and for that she sought retaliation. Medea? s hubby, Jason, had dishonored her with his infidelity. Medea sought to kill everything that was of import in Jason? s life in order to seek justness. Clytaemnestra and Medea are similar but yet different in the ways that they define justness, setup up their victims, carry out the merely sentence and in the terminal justify their actions. Clytaemnestra feels the lone justness for the decease of her girl, Iphigeneia, is the decease of Agamemnon. ? Act for an act, lesion for lesion! ? is the lone justification that Clytaemnestra tins see ( Agamemnon 1555 ) . Medea besides sees decease as the lone justification for her hubbies? infidelity. ? To remain here, and in this I will do dead organic structures / Of three of my enemies, -father, the miss and my hubby? ( Medea 370-71 ) . Medea says here that she wishes to kill Kreon, the male parent of the princess Jason will marry, the princess and Jason. Although she neer kills Jason, she does successfully kill Kreon and the princess. Medea subsequently says that she must besides kill her kids to do Jason hurting. In their shaping justness Clytaemnestra and Medea both feel decease is the lone justness. However, with Medea she does non mean to kill Jason. In order for Clytaemnestra to seek justness for her girls? decease, she had to do Agamemnon experience as though nil was incorrect. Clytaemnestra gives a large address when Agamemnon arrives stating everybody how? great the love she bore her hubby, and the agonizing heartache she had suffered in his absence? ( Hamilton 253 ) . She laid ruddy tapestries for him to walk on, and made him experience as though he was worthy plenty to walk on them. Like Clytaemnestra, Medea uses her words to do Kreon and Jason feel as though she is being sincere. Medea convinces Kreon to allow her hold another twenty-four hours before she is banished, by stating him that she needs to happen a topographic point to populate and that she needs to? look for support? for her kids ( Medea 337-339 ) . Medea tells Jason that she is incorrect for what she has said and that he is right for get marrieding a princess, because it will be better for their kids ( Medea 845-954 ) . Clytaemnestra and Medea set their victim s up by doing them experience as though nil is incorrect. Clytaemnestra decides the manner to kill Agamemnon is while he is bathing, there he is defenceless. Clytaemnestra carries out the sentence that she sees merely by cut downing Agamemnon with a blade three times. Then she kills Cassandra, Agamemnon? s courtesan he received for get the better ofing Troy, whom she sees as a nuisance if left alive. Medea, on the other manus does non utilize beastly force at first to kill like Clytaemnestra , alternatively she uses what she knows best, toxicant. Medea sends the kids with Jason bearing gifts for the princess. These gifts consist of a frock and aureate Crown laced with toxicant, which will kill anyone who comes in contact with it. The princess and Kreon both die as a consequence of the toxicant loaded gifts. When Medea finds out that the gifts killed the princess and Kreon she now uses beastly force like Clytaemnestra, by turning the blade on her kids. Clytaemnestra is non every bit barbarous as is Medea. Clytaemnestra could hold killed her boy for whom she saw as a menace, but chose non to because she loved her kids so much ( Hamilton 257 ) . Could Clytaemnestra hold caused the hurting on Jason with out killing her kids? Clytaemnestra and Medea have two different attacks to warranting their actions. Clytaemnestra? ? saw no ground to explicate her act or pardon it. She was non a liquidator in her ain eyes, she was an executioner. She has punished a liquidator, a liquidator of his ain kid, ? he murdered for the Thracian air currents, she feels it needs no account ( Hamilton 255 ) . She feels it is an? Act for act, lesion for lesion? ( Agamemnon 1555 ) , therefore it is merely. In Euripides? Medea the chorus does non happen mistake with Medea for penalizing Jason for what he had done. But they do happen mistake with her killing her kids, they see no justification in it. As for Medea, she believes it must be done for two grounds. First, the kids? s destiny was sealed when they delivered the gifts to the princess. It is possible that reverberations could hold been brought against the kids, either by decease or being castawaies for their engagement. Second, and most significantly, the sheer fact of doing J ason hurting. It is non Agamemnon? s infidelity that has spawned Clytaemnestra? s hatred for her hubby, but instead? a female parents love for a girl, and a married woman? s finding to revenge that decease by killing her hubby? ( Hamilton 252 ) . Clytaemnestra and Medea both feel that decease is the lone justifiable action for what their hubbies have done. The difference is that Medea does non kill her hubby, alternatively wants him to experience the hurting of the decease that surrounds him. Both Clytaemnestra and Medea use words to put up their victims but they do non transport out the sentences wholly in the same manner. Clytaemnestra largely uses beast force where Medea uses her cognition of toxicant to make the major harm. In the terminal though, Medea does utilize beastly force to kill her kids. One thing is left to inquiry, could Medea hold brought this hurting to Jason without killing her kids? I do non believe so. Jason, seems to be most troubled by the decease of his kids than he does of either Kreon or the princess? decease. Plants Cited Aeschylus. The Oresteia. Agamemnon. Trans. Robert Fagles. Lawall 1: 521- 566. Euripides. Medea. Trans. Rex Warner. Lawall 1: 642? 672. Hamilton, Edith. Mythology: Dateless Narratives of Gods and Heros. New York: Warner Books, 1969. Lawall, Sarah and others, explosive detection systems. The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. 7th erectile dysfunction. 2 vols. New York: W. W. Norton and Co. , 1999.